Fighting the Destruction of Families!
  • Home
  • old News and comments

old News

  • 21 Nov 2014 9:42 PM | Administrator (Administrator)



    PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN 6) -- A founder of the country’s leading gay rights organization was arrested Wednesday on charges related to an incident with a 15-year-old boy last year.

    The Portland Police Bureau’s Sex Crimes Unit took Terrence Bean into custody at his home in Southwest Portland following a Lane County Grand Jury indictment.


    Bean, 66, was on the ground floor of the Human Rights Campaign, according to terrybeanpolitics.com, and is listed as an HRC board member and Portland’s sole representation in the group’s leadership on hrc.org.

    Bean’s lawyer, Kristen Winemiller, said in a statement Wednesday that it is Bean who has been victimized, and “look[s] forward to the opportunity to clear his name.”

    “Over the course of several months in 2013-2014 Terry was the victim of an extortion ring led by several men known to law enforcement,” Winemiller said.

    Winemiller said the arrest is connected to an ongoing investigation of a case Bean fully cooperated with. Still, sources familiar with the investigation told KOIN 6 News they believe there may be more victims in the case, part of an overarching investigation, and others may face charges.

    “No allegations against Terry Bean should be taken at face value,” Winemiller said.

    Amid the allegations, dozens of supporters took to social media defending Bean, including celebrated LGBT advocate and benefactor Bill Dickey.



    In a Facebook post Nov. 19, Bill Dickey defended Terry Bean. (Facebook/ Bill Dickey)




    Dickey’s post had more than 20 comments echoing his sentiments.

    But Jeff Warila, a longtime neighbor of Bean’s Hayden Island residence, said he saw Bean bring younger-looking men to the condo and said he is not surprised by the charges. Warila said he saw Bean engaged in sexual acts with young-looking men through his kitchen window.

    “The young men that come here, they seem happy, no one looks like they’re here under duress,” Warila noted.

    Terry Bean was booked into the Multnomah County Jail, where he was released after posting bail. He faces a pending court date in Lane County, where Portland Police Bureau Sgt. Pete Simpson said the crimes occurred.


    Source: http://koin.com/2014/11/19/portland-gay-rights-leader-arrested-in-sex-case/

  • 19 Nov 2014 6:34 PM | Administrator (Administrator)

    By Karen Gullo, Bloomberg News
    November 16, 2014

    SAN FRANCISCO -- California can't enforce a law to combat sex trafficking because it tramples on free speech rights of sex offenders by requiring them to report online activities, such as their Twitter, e-mail and chatroom accounts, a U.S. appeals court ruled.

     

    The San Francisco-based court Tuesday upheld a judge's decision to block enforcement of a voter-approved law that was backed by former Facebook Inc. executive Chris Kelly and garnered support from more than 80 percent of California voters in 2012.

     

    The measure, known as Proposition 35, isn't clear about what accounts or Internet service providers offenders are required to report and targets online speech that could include blogging about politics and posting comments on news articles, the appeals court's three-judge panel said Tuesday.

     

    The law also harms sex offenders' ability to engage in anonymous speech because it allegedly allows police to disclose their online identities to the public, the court said. Failure to report on Internet activity can lead to criminal sanctions.

     

    A requirement that registered sex-offenders notify police within 24 hours of using a new Internet identity chills activity protected by the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, U.S. Circuit Judge Jay S. Bybee wrote in the unanimous ruling.

     

    Attorneys for the law's backers had argued it doesn't regulate the speech of sex offenders and would give police a head start to investigate when a parent reports that a child has been communicating with a stranger online and was going to meet that person.

     

    While the state has a legitimate interest in preventing sexual exploitation and human trafficking, California officials didn't show that blocking the law would seriously hamper the ability of law enforcement to investigate online sex offenses because there are other methods to do so, the court said.

     

    "There will be some hardship on the state," the court said. "Nevertheless, the balance of equities favors" the sex offenders who sued to overturn Proposition 35, "whose First Amendment rights are being chilled."

     

    David Beltran, a spokesman for California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who defended the law, didn't immediately respond to an e-mail seeking comment on the ruling. A call to Harris's press office wasn't immediately returned.

     

    Two unidentified California sex offenders and the American Civil Liberties Union filed named Harris and Kelly as defendants in their 2012 challenge to provisions of the Californians Against Sexual Exploitation Act.

     

    Source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-wp-blm-news-bc-calif-sex-offenders18-20141118-story.html


    See also: DOE V. HARRIS 13-15263
     

  • 18 Nov 2014 3:00 PM | Administrator (Administrator)
    By Jason Morris, CNN July 31, 2014
    Dallas (CNN) -- Michael Phillips has been spending most of his time these days living in a tiny room in a no-frills northeast Dallas nursing home.
    Until recently, he had a roommate who slept in a bed 2 feet away, and staff brought him three square meals a day.


    Only a few hours passed each day in which he didn't think about his burden of four decades: being a convicted sex offender.


    That was before Friday, when Phillips was officially exonerated by Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins' Conviction Integrity Unit, which determined via DNA testing that he was falsely convicted. The state will now pay him handsomely for its mistake.


    Man exonerated after decades in jail Exonerated man makes music


    It was a first-of-its-kind exoneration in that Phillips wasn't clamoring for vindication. As was the case when he accepted a plea deal in 1990, he felt that his race would preclude him from getting a fair shake in the justice system, so he just accepted his plight.


    After entering his plea, Phillips, a 57-year-old African-American who grew up in New Orleans, served 12 years in a Texas prison for the rape of a 16-year-old white girl at a Dallas motel where he'd worked as a maintenance man.
    Confined to a wheelchair due to his battle with sickle cell anemia, Phillips has been out of jail since 2002. He has been living in nursing homes the past few years as his health has spiraled downward.


    Though he's been out of prison for 12 years, he considers his life one long sentence, as he was forced to wear the branding of a convicted sex offender.
    In his first week as a free man, Phillips is overjoyed and struggles to put his emotions into words, instead pointing to the spirituality that helped him cope all these years.


    "A-W-E doesn't describe the feeling. I don't know if they got a word that describes how I feel. To have a leash taken off my neck and off my ankle, I know how my ancestors felt when they got free," he said.


    Falsely Accused


    According to the Dallas Police Department report from September 28, 1990, the victim was awakened by a man wearing a black and white ski mask.


    While struggling with the man and biting his hand several times, the victim told police, she pulled up her assailant's mask and recognized him as Phillips, a man she had seen living at the motel.


    The following month, detectives showed the victim a six-picture lineup, and she again identified Phillips as the man who raped her.


    (The Dallas Police Department no longer presents photos side by side, because the district attorney's office says it suggests that the perpetrator must be present and compels the victim to pick one.)


    It didn't help that Phillips had a record. In an interview with CNN, Phillips acknowledged committing a home burglary when he was 19.


    "Being young and foolish, there were things you do that were juvenile," he said.
    But at 32, he was trying to make an honest living and was shocked to hear that he was being charged with a rape that he hadn't committed. He feels that the prior burglary conviction and a "broken criminal justice system" were to blame for the bad advice he got next.


    "The first paid public defender came in there and said, 'Mr. Phillips, the DA went back and saw that you just got out of prison a couple of years ago, so they want to lock you up for 99 years.' He thought he was doing me a favor. He said, 'You could get life, so you are going to take this 99 years.' "
    Eventually, another public defender convinced him to cut a deal and plead guilty in exchange for 12 years behind bars, rather than risk a trial. Fearing that a jury would not side with him after a white girl picked him out of a photo lineup, he took the deal, he said.


    He recalled distinctly the words of one public defender.

    "You are a black man. This is a young white girl who has been assaulted. You have an X on your back already. What do you think the chances are if you go before an all-white jury?" the defense lawyer asked.

    "Aren't you supposed to get a jury of your peers?" Phillips replied.
    "Yeah, but it's not going to happen."
    Phillips wonders today how many poor folks or people of color were denied a chance at justice in Dallas.


    "(The system) is really broke down so bad. It's like I'm going to stab you and cut you from the neck down to your navel, and all I do is put a Band-Aid across it and tell you that you are going to be all right," he said. "That's how the justice system is, because all of them young black men that are getting arrested, they are doomed once the police slap the handcuffs on them and put them in the back of a police car."


    A living hell


    The youngest of nine children, Phillips is close with his family. Two of his older siblings are still alive, and he is tight with his oldest sister's children, who live in Dallas.


    After his release from prison, Phillips tried to stay with his sister, but once people in the neighborhood found out his history, they put signs on her door and front yard.


    "It's hard to have people look at you sideways and upside-down and cross-eyed and roll their eyes at you," Phillips said.


    His niece and nephew, Karen Collins and Keith Wilkerson, concede that they didn't know for sure he was innocent. Phillips was embarrassed by the past and didn't bring it up, they said.


    "He never talked about it, and I can say that it's not like him to do something like that, but him not talking about it gave me doubt," Collins said.


    After he got out of prison, they said, Phillips struggled to make ends meet, picking up odd jobs as a handyman to pay rent on small apartments. He was forced to move around a lot, and he always had a hard time finding new places to live.


    "He just took what life gave him. He was a passive person, not a fighter, which makes it ironic that he was charged with a violent crime," Collins said. "And the sentence didn't stop when he was out. It just made it more visible to the outside world because he was a sex offender.


    "He had to deal with the discrimination of being limited to where he could live and work. Where can you get a job?" the niece said.


    Last year, Phillips was booted from a nursing home because the staff found out he carried sex offender status, Wilkerson said.


    Phillips said he felt helpless: "I didn't have any say in any of my life. You have that label. You have that sticker on your front and back. Bad enough you have to do 12 years for something you didn't do. Now you have to do something for the rest of your life. You have to report."


    Now exonerated, Phillips says he's going to focus on dealing with his other sentence: sickle cell anemia.


    "It's a war. The older I get, the worse this disease gets. I'm fighting a war with my body," he said.


    Even with this battle at hand, his niece and nephew say they are excited to see him take it on without the burden of his conviction.


    "His entire life has been held down and limited. The sky is the limit now," Collins said.


    Conviction integrity?


    Phillips' case is the 34th exoneration by the Dallas District Attorney's Office since the 2007 advent of the Conviction Integrity Unit.
    The unit is a long-term project that screens untested rape kits by reviewing DNA databases that are preserved by the Southwest Institute of Forensic Sciences.
    It is essentially using DNA testing to conduct an audit of all convictions in Dallas County for which testing may prove the guilt or innocence of a defendant.
    So far, they have tackled only sexual assault convictions from 1990 that meet the following criteria:


    • There was biological evidence available that included seminal fluid.
    • There was only one rapist (cases with biological samples from more than one person are much harder to work with).
    • The attacker's identity was in dispute at the time of the conviction.


    According to the district attorney, Phillips is the first DNA exoneration in the United States that was identified by a systematic search of old criminal convictions, as opposed to a challenge by a defendant or any other party.
    "Mr. Phillips is very lucky that we tested rape kits from the year in which the heinous crime took place," Watkins said in a written statement. "DNA tells the truth, so this was another case of eyewitness misidentification where one individual's life was wrongfully snatched and a violent criminal was allowed to go free.


    "We apologize to Michael Phillips for a criminal justice system that failed him."
    The semen found in the rape kit was put into the FBI's combined DNA Index System. It matched the sample of another man who also lived at the motel where the rape took place, the district attorney's office said, but that person can't be prosecuted because the statute of limitations has expired.
    Assistant District Attorney Russell Wilson, who heads the Conviction Integrity Unit, had the task of driving out of state to tell the victim Phillips was the not the man who raped her.


    Phillips plans to move out of his nursing home now.


    "She was very distraught and cried quite a bit. She said she couldn't believe she picked the wrong person out of the photo lineup and felt horrible about that. The victim also said she never got over the sexual assault and had seven dogs because she always feared someone was going to kick down her door like the night of the rape at the motel," Wilson said.
    "She broke down again upon learning we cannot prosecute the real perpetrator due to the statute of limitations."
    Phillips does not hold a grudge against the woman who was responsible for his fate. Like him, she was a victim whose life was turned upside-down, he said.
    "I pray for her, I forgive her, and I bless her."
    'Huge racial disproportion'
    Samuel Gross, a University of Michigan law professor and editor of the National Registry of Exonerations, says he persuaded Watkins' office to start this project several years ago and has worked as an adviser on the legal team ever since.
    A 2012 National Registry of Exonerations study found that among rape exonerations with eyewitness misidentifications, most involved a white victim and African-American assailant.
    "That's huge racial disproportion," Gross said. "In most rapes, the attacker and the victim are of the same race. Rapes with white victims and black rapists are less than 10% of the total. So why do they make up a majority of rape cases in which innocent defendants are exonerated? I think the most powerful reason is the difficulty identifying strangers of a different race."
    Psychological experiments bear this out, Gross said, "and in the United States, the biggest problem is Caucasians have a much harder time identifying African-Americans than identifying members of our own race."
    Gross hopes the successes in Dallas create a road map to reproduce similar results in other jurisdictions, he said.
    "We should do it, to the extent possible, because there may be a lot of innocent defendants who were convicted of terrible crimes who we could identify but who have just given up or moved on as best they can. Also, this sort of project might teach us lessons about the causes of wrongful convictions that we would never learn from other exonerations," Gross said.
    Phillips is pleased Watkins and his unit are trying to help the many innocent men he met while incarcerated. Watkins and his team say they will continue fighting to free them.
    "On one hand, this was like finding a needle in a haystack, because Michael Phillips had given up on pressing his claim of innocence, but on the other hand, this was a methodical approach that can be replicated nationwide," Watkins said. "Untested rape kits should not just sit on a shelf and collect dust. The exoneration continues to expose the past weakness in our criminal justice system."
    Newly minted millionaire
    Last week's exoneration not only clears Phillips' name and his credit report, it will also make him a wealthy man.
    Texas law awards an exoneree $80,000 for each year of wrongful incarceration, so Phillips will get a lump sum of $960,000 and then $80,000 a year for as long as he lives.
    Texas also offers exonerees state-run health insurance and a free education, if they choose.
    His family is planning to throw a big party for him this weekend, complete with barbecue, music and lots of joyous embraces.
    Beyond that, all Phillips knows for sure about the future is that he is going to move out of his nursing home, buy a new vehicle and go to the dentist.
    "The first thing I am going to do is get a Ford pickup truck and a house. Or I might just hit the road. You got 50 states. I might just hit the road and visit the rest of the country. I dreamed of going to China and walking on the Great Wall of China," he said.
    Phillips has contemplated these possibilities for some time, never thinking that it was possible that his "crazy daydreams" could one day become reality.
    But before he's done with his interview, he goes back to his original message. Leaning on an old Dorothy Love Coates gospel tune, he wants to make sure we know what he is really thankful for.
    "Hang on to your faith. The Father works in his own time, and like the good song says: He may not come when you want to, but He's always on time."


    Source: http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/31/us/texas-rape-exoneration/index.html



  • 18 Nov 2014 11:28 AM | Administrator (Administrator)
    Noah Pransky, WTSP-TV, Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla. August 8, 2014

    An investigation uncovers questionable tactics used by police officers to put alleged sexual offenders behind bars. VPC

    BARTOW, Fla.;  In the decade since Dateline NBC's To Catch a Predator segments popularized Internet sex stings, more than 1,200 men in Florida have been arrested, accused of preying on underage teens and children for sex. 
    But as the stings put more and more men behind bars, detectives are working harder and harder to keep up their arrest numbers. And the tactics they're using to put alleged sexual offenders in jail are sweeping up large numbers of law-abiding men, too.

    Many of the men whose mugshots sheriffs have been paraded in made-for-TV press conferences were not seeking to meet children online, according to a yearlong WTSP-TV investigation. Instead, they were looking for other adults when detectives started to persuade them to break the law.

    Detectives used to post ads suggesting that an underage teen or child was available for sex but now routinely post more innocuous personal ads of adults on traditional dating sites.

    When men, many of them younger than 25 with no criminal history, respond, officers switch the bait and typically indicate their age is really 14 or 15 years old. However, sometimes the storyline isn't switched until the men, who were looking for legal love, already start falling for an undercover agent.

    Officers also now are responding to men's ads on dating sites like PlentyOfFish.com. After the men start online chats with people they think are adults, agents change the age they claim to be but try to persuade the men to continue the conversation anyway.

    Other examples include undercover officers showing interest in a man then later introducing the idea of having sex with the agent's "child." If the men indicate they aren't interested, many still were arrested for talking to the adult.  Critics of the stings say the operations make for better press conferences than crime fighting. Many of the men charged with sexual-predator crimes see little jail time but a lifetime on the sex offender registry. 

    But when Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd was asked about overly aggressive detectives, he went on the offensive.

    "The concern (I have) is that you inflate your investigative reporting to make it glitzy," he said.

    Judges also have been critical of some tactics used in the stings, which violate Internet Crimes Against Children guidelines. Among the judges' comments in recent entrapment decisions:

    It was the agent who repeatedly steered the conversation back to sexual activity with a minor.
    The government made a concerted effort to lure him into committing a crime.
    The undercover officer failed to follow the procedures.
    The law does not tolerate government action to provoke a law-abiding citizen to commit a crime.

    The judge in one dismissed case criticized the undercover officer for failing to follow procedures, saying "the officer controlled the tone, pace and subject matter of online conversation, pushing toward a discussion of sexual activity."

    Defense lawyer Anthony Ryan, who has a practice in Sarasota, Fla., just got a 23-year-old client's case dismissed in Manatee, Fla. A judge ruled that deputies entrapped his client, writing that their tactics had "no place in modern day law enforcement."

    "They are really good at subtly turning conversations and normal statements into sexual innuendo; whether or not the other side intended that," Ryan said.

    The blurring of legal and ethical lines has led many agencies such as the Pasco County Sheriff's Office, the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office and others in south Florida to focus their cybercrime resources in other areas such as child porn and sex trafficking.

    Hillsborough and Pasco county detectives say those investigations yield better conviction rates and longer prison terms. They also provide law enforcement with additional leads.

    "Any way you can take a sexual predator off the street is tremendous, especially those that are online looking at child pornography," said Sheriff Chris Nocco of Pasco County. "They may do something physically against a young little kid."

    But predator stings are still alive in central Florida, operating under Judd, who is head of the Florida Sheriff's Task Force on Internet crimes against children.

    Predator hunting is one sheriff's 'favorite topic'

    Sheriff of Polk County since 2005, Judd has made it clear that targeting sexual predators is his top priority.

    He called hunting predators his favorite topic at a recent press conference, and he has invited national media outlets along for some of the operations. His office's predator stings have been featured in three MSNBC specials as well as a recent CNN series.

    But Judd has been much less forthcoming on how detectives lure targets and whether innocent men are getting swept up.

    Judd has failed to provide information on the following issues, which are considered public records under Florida's Sunshine law:

    • The language in the ads that detectives post.
    • How detectives respond when innocent men show no interest in speaking to teens.
    • Whether they see a problem of teens looking for adults online.
    • How many men detectives contact before finding someone to investigate.

    An overwhelming majority of men who communicate with detectives either end communication or report the undercover officer's activities to authorities, Judd said.

    Judd maintains that the records are exempt from state open-records laws because all of the men are still under investigation because they may surface in future stings. However, that response indicates that Judd and other law-enforcement leaders who have used the same exemption to withhold requested records have investigations open on hundreds, maybe thousands, of men who legally communicated with adults on legal websites.

    Judd also showed little concern for due process during a Tuesday press conference to tout arrests since March in predator-style stings. He pointed to 132 mugshots on a giant posterboard and called the men "sexual predators."

    Some of the men already have been cleared of charges, he called them "fair game"

    "We have a very liberal, a very forgiving, criminal justice system," Judd said.

    The other victims of sheriffs' stings

    Men who victimize children or look for underage victims online can't be excused.

    However, it's easier to make a case for men swept up in stings when they were looking for adults online.

    "(My son) was stalked by law enforcement for three days," said the mother of a 22-year-old arrested in one of the stings who asked not to be identified because of the stigma that the arrest has brought.

    Her son was on Craiglist's personals pages looking to meet other adults. He responded to a no-strings-attached ad for a 26-year-old woman.

    The story from the woman, really an undercover agent, changed a few times, including a claim that she was only 13, but he said he was skeptical.

    He spoke on the phone to her and she sent a photo in which she was wearing a wedding ring. He said he was sure she was an adult "she was" so he made plans to meet her. When he arrived, he was arrested.

    He later was sentenced to two years of house arrest and a lifetime as a registered sex offender.

    "He had a life of promise. He had an education," his mother said. "That's all been shot."

    Internet Crimes Against Children stings typically cost tens of thousands of dollars (sometimes close to $100,000) and that doesn't include prosecuting and incarcerating defendants.

    Light sentences sometimes are offered because suspects aren't considered dangerous offenders, contrary to Judd's claims.

    Defense attorney Ryan adds that officers are pushing the boundaries to keep their arrest numbers up and keep federal grants flowing. And responding to legal ads on legal dating sites crosses the line.

    "Once the low-hanging fruit is sort of gone, taken off the tree, there's still pressure from high above to justify these actions," he said.

    Tampa-area authorities refused to turn over the federal government's guidelines for Internet Crimes Against Children investigations, saying they are confidential investigative material. However, a list of the following targets was part of public record in one court case:

    1. A child at immediate risk of victimization.

    2. A child vulnerable to victimization by a known offender.

    3. A known suspect aggressively soliciting a child or children.

    4. A manufacturer, distributor or possessor with images that appear to be home (pornography) photography with children.

    5. Aggressive, high-volume child pornography manufacturers or distributors who either are commercial distributors, repeat offenders, or specialize in sadistic images.

    6. Manufacturers, distributors or solicitors involved in high-volume trafficking or who belong to an organized child-pornography ring that operates as a criminal conspiracy.

    7. Distributors, solicitors and possessors of images of child pornography.

    8. Any other form of child victimization.

    Source: Florida court records

    Source: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/08/sexual-predator-stings/13770553/


  • 13 Nov 2014 10:08 PM | Administrator (Administrator)


    KALAMAZOO, Mich. (WWMT NEWSCHANNEL 3) - Does the sex offender registry really keep you safe?

    A former West Michigan judge says it's giving you a false sense of security.

    Newschannel 3 looked into those claims, taking our search across state lines to see how sex offenders are tracked in other areas.

    You can search for them by your address or your entire city, finding their home address, and even where they work.

    But does knowing where a sex offender lives keep your family safe? At least one former judge doesn't think so.

    "People have a false sense of being protected. And it's not," said retired Van Buren Co. Judge William Buhl. "In my opinion it's not protecting people."

    "It's not risk based, it's conviction based," he said. "So nobody looks at the individuals and asks the question, should we really be afraid of this person?"

    Take Robert Keith for example.

    In December of 2013, he was charged with three counts of criminal sexual conduct in Kalamazoo County.

    The 61-year-old was giving karate lessons at his home, and court documents show he was accused of inappropriately touching three teenage boys between 2009 and 2013 at his dojo on Nazareth Road.

    Keith was already on the sex offender registry in Florida.

    He was even designated as a predator, after being convicted in 1997 of three sex crimes on a victim under 12.

    In Florida, he would have been held to higher standards, but in Michigan, Keith was only required to check in four times a year with police--which is the national standard.

    "While he was on supervision and parole in Michigan, he couldn't have contact," Buhl said. "Once he was off parole, that was the end of it; he could do whatever he wanted, and he did and has new victims with the same modus operandi. That should never happen."

    Keith killed himself before he could stand trial.

    His case is just one of the many across the country that has people calling for more restrictions beyond the registry.

    Every state is required to publish the sex offender registry, and to make offenders on the highest tier level check in four times a year, but that's the end of the federal law.

    Some states do go beyond though.

    Illinois has a sex offender management board to evaluate and give treatment. Florida has a designated predator title for those they believe could offend again. In Pennsylvania, they also have a sexual offender assessment board--or SOAB--to determine if an offender might break the law again.

    "It's comprised of, in Pennsylvania, is law enforcement officials, psychologists, things of that nature where this individual gets assessed by SOAB, and SOAB will then recommend whether or not this person should be a sexually violent predator," explained Lieutenant Todd Harman, the Megan's Law commander for the Pennsylvania State Police.

    The public can then see who has been given that distinction.

    "It means that they are more likely to repeat the offense and therefor are a bigger danger to the public," Lt. Harman said.

    In Pennsylvania, 1,151 sex offenders are considered violent predators.

    Once out of prison, they are required to attend monthly counseling, on top of their check ins with police.

    In Michigan, we follow all the federal guidelines for monitoring sex offenders. But State Police tell us that law doesn't assess them.

    "It's important to realize while this law is required to keep track of these people, it's not necessarily saying that they are going to re-offend," said Lieutenant Dale Hinz, with the Michigan State Police.

    Buhl says he believes only about 15 percent of our more than 40,000 registered sex offenders are dangerous and likely to repeat their crimes.

    "Those people you need to work with them because they don't go away," he said.

    He tells us effective monitoring and treatment of offenders would go a long way to keep situations like what is believed to have happened in Keith's dojo from happening again.

    Here in Michigan, most judges do order treatment while an offender is behind bars.

    Changes to the registry here in Michigan, above the federal law, would have to come from Lansing.

    We are taking this information to our local lawmakers to see what they think.

    First video report:



    (NEWSCHANNEL 3) - We have an update now to a special report we brought you Wednesday night.
    At 11:00 we looked into Michigan's Sex Offender Registry after a retired judge told us the state needs to do more to assess and monitor potential dangerous offenders.
    Jessica Wheeler took that information to local lawmakers and has their reaction to our special report Predator Alert in the video report above.


    Follow up video report:




    http://www.wwmt.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/Former-judge-says-sex-offender-registry-gives-39-false-sense-39-of-security-57229.shtml


    http://www.wwmt.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/-Lawmakers-weigh-in-on-sex-offender-registry-special-report-57275.shtml



  • 12 Nov 2014 11:15 AM | Vicki Henry

    http://www.radioworld.com/article/fcc-revokes-ham-license-for-convicted-sex-offender/273259


    History:

    March 11, 2010  Amateur Radio Enforcement

    FCC fails in attempt revoke ham license 

    At issue was question of licensee's character

    The FCC wanted to revoke the General Class amateur radio license of David Titus (Seattle, Wash.) on grounds that he was not fit to be a Commission licensee. Titus has held KB7ILD for more than twenty years. He also operates a radio repeater on 444.375 MHz. His license expired on June 8, 2009, but his timely filed renewal was held up by the FCC's Enforcement Bureau due to questions about his character. 

    There was no complaint about Titus' radio knowledge, ability or competency ...only his character qualifications and his past history of convictions on sex crimes against minors that occurred between 1986 and 1993. The FCC felt this should disqualify him from holding an Amateur Radio station license. 

    On January 30, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau issued a "Show Cause Order" that began a proceeding to revoke Titus' Amateur Radio license. The burden of proof was assigned to the Bureau and hearings were conducted in mid 2008 and early 2009. 

    Background 

    Testimony determined that Titus grew up with an abusive father, was raped by a babysitter at age 6 and became aware that he was gay at age 13. He became interested in CB and ham radio and was first licensed as a Novice (with the call sign KB7ILD) at age 14 (1988). 

    At age 11, (1985) Titus was found guilty of indecency with an 8-year-old boy which resulted in his confinement. Between the ages 13 and 14, he was assigned to a youth facility for one-year for treatment as a sex offender. A year later, Titus pled guilty to taking indecent liberties with a 12-year-old boy. At age 18, as an adult, Mr. Titus pled guilty to one felony count of communication with an 11-year-old boy for immoral purposes. He was sentenced to 25 months. 

    Titus fulfilled all his sentences and paid all fines and penalties and has not been accused or charged with any other sex offense since he was 18, he is now age 40. In 1995, at age 20, the Seattle police classified Mr. Titus as a Level 2 sex offender -- meaning he was only a "moderate risk" to re-offend -- and was required to register as a sex offender. His classification was later raised to Level 3 "high risk." But no rational explanation was shown for assigning a higher classification to Titus. 

    Appearance before Administrative Law Judge 

    A psychologist's expert opinion concluded that Titus had demonstrated the past 15 years that his former predispositions towards young boys were in remission, was not in need of treatment for sexual deviancy and that he is not likely to re-offend. Titus, now 35, testified that he has not had sexual contact with any minor since he was charged with felony child abuse in 1993 at the age of 18 and that he is no longer sexually attracted to children. 

    Ten character witnesses complimented Mr. Titus' character, including: a clergyman, a police officer, a corrections officer, a school counselor, a government contractor, a Red Cross worker, a lab engineer, and Mr. Titus' mother. Each presented written testimony on his behalf. Several of the witnesses are active in Amateur Radio and approved of his on-the-air conduct. 

    One radio club, the Lake Washington Ham Club, however, was concerned since ham radio is an activity in which youths participate through such organizations as the Boy Scouts and community and school radio clubs. LWHC said that a convicted sex offender, who is licensed, could use his Amateur Radio to contact children for immoral purposes. Their concern was heightened by the fact that Titus also operates a wide area "repeater" station. But there was no evidence of Titus ever mentoring a minor or communicating with a minor through Amateur Radio or on his repeater frequency. 

    Conclusions of law 

    The Administrative Law Judge agreed that a licensee's character is relevant in determining qualifications for continuing to hold an FCC license. "In determining character, prior felony convictions must be considered." Titus' misconduct consists of two felony child molestation judgements as a juvenile (ages 11 and 15), and one adult (age 18) felony conviction for communicating with a minor for immoral purposes. "Evidence of all felonies must be considered in evaluating character." 

    Willfully taking advantage of a child for sexual purposes, by anyone 18 years of age or older, is an act that the Presiding Judge considered to be "shockingly evil." However, under the laws of the United States, including the Administrative Procedure Act and the Communications Act, the government must prove by a preponderance of evidence that a person convicted of conduct that occurred 18 years ago probably cannot be rehabilitated. 

    Judge Sippel said "The Bureau has failed to prove that any conduct of Titus from the time of his release from prison in 1995 to the present shows any prognostication that is based on substantial evidence of probable recidivism." 

    "To the contrary, Mr. Titus presented expert psychologist testimony that he now has no attraction to minors and there is no probability of his repeating his past misconduct in the future. This constitutes convincing proof of rehabilitation. The Bureau, however, failed to offer opposing proof of a qualified expert. So while Mr. Titus has satisfactorily proven his rehabilitation, the Bureau has not met its burden to prove non-rehabilitation by a preponderance of evidence." 

    One recognized mitigating factor is a substantial lapse of time since the violation. In this case, the crimes in question were committed 18 years ago when Titus was 11, 15 and 18 years of age. "The evidence supports the conclusion that Mr. Titus is now attracted to adults and is no longer attracted to minors. Substantial credible evidence shows Titus to be rehabilitated. He now is a 35-year-old adult whose last conviction was adjudicated while he was only 18 years old. The fact that he has lived in the community for 15 years without being charged with a crime is substantial and reliable evidence of his rehabilitation." 

    "An overall record of compliance with Commission rules and policies is relevant in assessing character. Mr. Titus has held an Amateur Radio license for 20 years, and there is no credible or reliable evidence even suggesting that he ever has used or ever would dare to use ham radio communication as a means to contact minors for illicit purposes." Judge Sippel wrote in his opinion. 

    In an Order released March 9, 2010, FCC Chief Administrative Law Judge Richard L Sippel ruled that, based on the evidence, "... the Enforcement Bureau failed to carry its burden of proof" and "ordered that the Amateur Radio Operator License of Amateur Radio Station KB7ILD held by Mr. David L. Titus shall not be revoked."

    Source: http://www.w5yi.org/ama_news_article.php?id=452

     

     

     11/10/2014 update:

    FCC Reverses ALJ’s Decision, Revokes Convicted Sex Offender’s Amateur Radio License

    The FCC has reversed the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who ruled in 2010 that David Titus, KB7ILD, of Seattle, Washington, could keep his Amateur Radio license in the wake of his conviction for a sex-related crime 17 years earlier. In his March 9, 2010, Initial Decision, ALJ Richard L. Sippel determined that Titus “has been a law-abiding member of his community for many years” and, based on evidence that Titus and witnesses on his behalf had presented, ordered that Titus’s amateur license not be revoked. Sippel also ruled that the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau had failed to meet the burden of proof necessary for revocation. He determined that Titus had shown remorse and been rehabilitated, and that the Enforcement Bureau had presented no credible evidence to indicate that Titus should be categorized as a high-risk sex offender. In a November 5 Decision in the proceeding (EB Docket 07-13), the FCC reversed Sippel’s decision.

    “We find that the ALJ erred in holding that the Enforcement Bureau failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that Titus is currently unqualified to remain a Commission licensee,” the Decision said, “inasmuch as the ALJ failed to consider relevant convictions for sex offenses and failed to give appropriate deference to the judgment of local law enforcement authorities that Titus is a convicted sex offender who poses a high risk to the safety of the community.”

    In January 2007 the FCC issued a show-cause Order and designated for hearing the issue of whether Titus was qualified to remain a licensee in light of a 1993 felony conviction for “communicating with a minor for immoral purposes.” TheCommunications Act provides that the FCC may revoke any license, if conditions come to its attention that would have warranted a denial of the licensee’s original application. The Commission has said in the past that felony convictions, “especially those involving sexual offenses involving children,” raise questions regarding a licensee’s character qualifications.

    Titus’s General class license expired in 2009, and the FCC had deferred action on his renewal application while the revocation proceeding was still in play. The FCC also dismissed Titus’s 2010 reply to the Enforcement Bureau’s exceptions in the matter, because they were filed 5 days late. The FCC said Sippel should have given more weight to incidents in 2002 and 2004 that, while not resulting in conviction, “prompted the Seattle Police Department to raise Titus’s assessed risk level from moderate to high.”

    “After a review of the record and the relevant case law, we find that the ALJ committed several errors in reaching his ultimate finding that [the Enforcement Bureau] did not meet its burden of proving that Titus lacks the requisite character qualifications to be an FCC license,” the Commission concluded. “In particular, we hold that the ALJ erred in failing to consider Titus’s two juvenile convictions and failed to give adequate weight to the State of Washington’s determination that Titus is a high-risk sex offender.” The FCC pointed out that Titus was confined for more than 1 year for each of his juvenile offenses, and they demonstrate that Titus’s “single adult felony conviction was not an isolated offense and is therefore all the more egregious and disqualifying.”

    The FCC said that given “known risks of Amateur Radios in the hands of sex offenders, such misconduct is prima facie disqualifying, and has resulted in the loss of licenses in past cases.”

    “In focusing on the impact of Titus’s misconduct on his qualifications to hold an Amateur Radio license,” the FCC concluded, “we would be remiss in our responsibilities as a licensing authority if we continue to authorize Titus to hold an Amateur Radio license that could be used to put him in contact with children.”

    Source:  http://www.arrl.org/news/view/fcc-reverses-alj-s-decision-revokes-convicted-sex-offender-s-amateur-radio-license

    See also:  FCC-14-177A1.pdf

     


8 The Green Suite #8219, Dover, DE 19901 | Support Hotline 800-311-3764 | Women Against Registry © 2011-2023

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software